Sandboxes run code. Docks keep the work.
Straight comparisons with other agent sandboxes and cloud computers: where Dock is different, where they are stronger, and which one fits your workload.
- Dock vs
E2B
Dock vs E2B: both run agents in Firecracker microVMs. Dock adds deny-by-default egress, native SSH, and a replayable audit timeline.
Read comparison - Dock vs
Daytona
Dock vs Daytona: Daytona defaults to containers with optional VMs. Every dock is a full VM with branching, deny-by-default egress, and a run timeline.
Read comparison - Dock vs
Modal Sandboxes
Dock vs Modal Sandboxes: Modal excels at huge numbers of short sandboxes. Dock gives agents long-lived machines with SSH, Docker, and a desktop.
Read comparison - Dock vs
boat
Dock vs boat (formerly Box by ASCII): both give agents persistent Ubuntu VMs with SSH, Docker, a desktop, and forks. Dock adds egress policy, brokered secrets, and audit.
Read comparison - Dock vs
Morph Cloud
Dock vs Morph Cloud: both offer persistent agent computers with branching. Dock documents egress policy, brokered credentials, and a run timeline.
Read comparison - Dock vs
Vercel Sandbox
Dock vs Vercel Sandbox: both use Firecracker microVMs. Dock keeps one machine identity across resume, denies egress by default, and adds a desktop and run timeline.
Read comparison
Tell us what your agents need to run.
Private beta is open. Describe your workload and we will reply about access.